Leasehold Enfranchisement Update – Barrie House

21st May 2015

Merie Bin Mahfouz Company (UK) Ltd v Barrie House (Freehold) Ltd [2014] UKUT 390 (LC)

The freeholder could not have a leaseback of “units” which were at the date of the initial notice common parts.


The freeholder, after service of the s. 13 notice, constructed a new flat in an area which had previously been used as the porter’s common room, maids’ rooms and communal WCs. The counter notice claimed a leaseback of the new flat.


 The main issue was whether the freeholder could claim a leaseback of a unit which did not exist at the date of the initial notice.

Decision on Appeal

The Upper Tribunal decided the freeholder could not claim a leaseback as the unit didn’t exist at the relevant date and because the freeholder could not claim a leaseback of common parts. For the same reasons an office in a communal area of the basement could not be the subject of a leaseback. The freeholder could, however, have a leaseback of an area containing telecoms equipment.

Expertise: Leasehold Enfranchisement & Lease Extensions


This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/ or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.



Sign up to our newsletter mailing list for the latest news.