28th February 2019
Rotenberg v Point West GR Ltd [2019] UKUT 0068 (LC)
The Upper Tribunal has turned its attention to the tribunal rules that apply when multiple leaseholders are being represented by one law firm. The UT considered the landlord’s representatives had engaged in ‘blatant gamesmanship’ over which tenants were being represented by a firm and the refusal by the FTT to grant a s.20C order because of a lack of clarity in representation was found to be unjustified.
Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure Rules 2013, provides:
14.— Representatives
As the UT found, once a solicitor had notified that it was acting for leaseholders, that was enough “The tribunal trusts a representation made by a solicitor or barrister as to their appointment because of their regulated professional status, backed up by the disciplinary rules and sanctions available in the event that the expected professional standards are not met.”
As the UT recognised in this case 399 leaseholders had been joined as parties, but in the context of disputes under the 1985 Act that was not unprecedented and that “It is important that such cases do not become bogged down in unnecessary procedural complexities. Ensuring that that does not happen is the responsibility of both the FTT itself and of the parties, especially parties with professional representation.”