Doberman v Watson

10th November 2017

The claimants were the freehold owners of land subject to a restrictive covenant prohibiting the erection of more than one dwelling-house on the land. The claimants wished to build another house on their land. The defendants, who owned neighbouring land, objected and sought to rely on the covenant. The claimants sought a declaration under s.84, Law of Property Act 1925 that their land was not affected by the covenant.

David Halpern QC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge, granted the declaration. The covenant did not bind the claimants because the benefit of the covenant had not been annexed to the defendant’s land in previous conveyances and neither did the defendant’s and claimants’ land form part of a building scheme with mutually enforceable covenants.

Team: Sam Madge-Wyld
Expertise: Real Property, Freehold Covenants


This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/ or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.



Sign up to our newsletter mailing list for the latest news.