Service Charges & Estate Management Update – December 2016
14th December 2016
There is only one case in this month’s update: Avon Freeholds Limited v Alexander Garnier  UKUT 477 (LC) which concerns whether a tenant had been under duress and had not ‘agreed’ to pay an administration charge.
Avon Freeholds Limited v Alexander Garnier  UKUT 477 (LC)
No duress had been applied by a landlord on his tenant when the former sought retrospective consent for works undertaken to his property and payment was then demanded for the same. An explicit statement from the tenant that a payment was “fine” constituted an acceptance of the administration charge such that the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) had had no jurisdiction to determine it.
Diane Doliveux discusses in more detail here.
Team: Diane Doliveux
Expertise: Service Charges
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/ or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.