Andrew Butler wins important landlord and tenant case

8th February 2016

Andrew Butler has achieved a significant victory in a property damage case which raised important questions about the entitlement of tenants to benefit from their landlord’s property insurance.

The facts of Fresca-Judd v Golovina were that the tenant, G, took an 18-month tenancy of a cottage in Wiltshire. Having moved in shortly before Christmas, she returned to London before New Year, leaving the property vacant. While she was away, a pipe burst caused extensive flooding damage. The landlord, F, who was obliged by a term of the lease to effect property insurance, was compensated by her insurers, and the insurers brought a subrogated claim against G. They alleged that (in breach of an express term in the lease) G had switched off the heating before vacating.

Andrew argued that, notwithstanding the absence of any obligation on the part of G to contribute to the insurance premium, the obligation of F to insure the property could only sensibly be interpreted as existing for F and G’s joint benefit. The parties had to be taken to have agreed that F would look to the insurers for compensation, rather than to G; and insurers exercising rights of subrogation could not be in a better position than F.

In a judgment given on Friday 5 February 2016, Holgate J agreed with this contention, also holding (for good measure) that insurers had not proved, on a balance of probabilities, that G had turned off the heating. In particular, they had not successfully excluded the possibility of simple mechanical failure.

The case was widely reported in the National Press and a copy of the judgment can be obtained via Lawtel.

Please click here for news article in The Telegraph.


Related areas


Sign up to our newsletter mailing list for the latest news.